Reducing Construction Accounting Complexity

The Real Estate Espresso Podcast

Reducing Construction Accounting Complexity

Spotify Google Podcast Apple Podcast Subscribe via RSS Leave a Review

Reducing Construction Accounting Complexity

Welcome to the Real Estate Espresso Podcast, your morning shot of what’s new in the world of real estate investing. I’m your host, Victor Menasce.

On today’s show we’re talking about how to set up the accounting for a construction project. There is a right way and a wrong way to do it.

But first, if you’ve been looking for a thoughtful way to invest in storage, the Y Street Capital storage fund might be worth your attention. The fund is currently invested in four storage assets with additional growth planned for 2026.

What I like about self-storage and industrial storage is its simplicity as a business and its resilience across a wide range of market conditions. When operated with discipline, there’s real potential to create value through better management, improved occupancy, and steady revenue growth.

For investors who want exposure to the sector without concentration risk of a single asset, that fund offers a more diversified approach. I’m sharing this for informational purposes only. It does not constitute an offer to sell or solicitation to buy securities. Any investment will be made through the fund’s offering documents and only accredited investors residing in the U.S., in compliance with the U.S. SEC laws, would be eligible.

If you’d like to learn more, send an email to podcast@victorjm.com and put the word “storage” in the subject line. Again, podcast@victorjm.com and we’ll get the information out to you.

On today’s show we’re talking about something that sounds administrative on the surface, but in reality can make or break the financial control of a construction project. That is, how you choose your budget categories. It sounds mundane, but it’s not.

Most people think of a budget as a list of costs: land, permits, concrete, framing, electrical, and so on. But that’s not how a construction project behaves in real life. A construction budget is not just a cost estimate; it’s a control system. It’s the framework that ties together invoicing, payment applications, loan draw requests, banking records, the accounting system, and ultimately your reporting to investors and lenders.

If you choose your budget categories intelligently, reconciling all of that can be relatively straightforward. But if you choose poorly, the administrative effort multiplies not a little bit, but a lot. And the pain usually doesn’t just show up on day one; it shows up every month in the project. And when you’ve got dozens of vendors, and partial payments, and change orders, and holdbacks, and lender draw inspections all happening at the same time, it gets complicated in a hurry.

In the textbook version of project accounting, it looks simple. You create a budget, you receive an invoice, you pay the invoice, you post it to the job, and compare the cost to the budget. But in construction it’s not textbook accounting. You have to approve an invoice for one amount, pay a smaller amount because of a contract or a holdback, submit a different number to the lender because of the draw structure, still have a pending change order that hasn’t been fully accepted. Add to that the sales tax rebate program, maybe some bonding for off-site improvements, and now one dollar of work can show up in three or four different places in the reporting system. And that’s why the structure of the budget matters so much.

A bad budget structure can be organized around convenience: “Let’s just make it one line item for the work—for site work, for structure, for interiors, for MEP.” It might look clean on a single sheet of paper, but it becomes almost impossible to manage once the project is active. Because in the real world, when the general contractor invoices you, they don’t necessarily break it down according to your categories. The lender doesn’t necessarily think in those categories either. The payment application doesn’t arrive in those categories.

The civil contractor might include storm, sanitary, water, paving, curbs, excavation, erosion control all in one application. But your bonding company might isolate off-site improvements. The municipality may reimburse only certain tax-paid materials. The accounting team needs to distinguish retainage from earned value. If the budget categories don’t align with the way the money actually moves, then every month becomes an exercise in translation. And in translation that’s where, number one, mistakes happen—but it just creates a lot of confusion. It makes reconciliation incredibly difficult.

That’s why using the industry standard divisions is the best starting point. Standard divisions were not invented to make life complicated. They exist because construction’s complicated. They provide a common language between estimators, contractors, lenders, cost consultants, architects, and owners. And when the budget starts with those standard divisions, you’re beginning with a structure that the rest of the industry already understands. It means that when an invoice arrives, it has a natural home. When a change order is issued, it can be coded correctly. And when the lender’s cost consultant reviews your draw request, the categories are familiar. When accounting reconciles the bank statement to the draw package, there’s less interpretation required—and less interpretation means fewer errors.

Now, I want to be clear: we’re not accountants, but we do have experience in this area. And experience is sometimes a euphemism for having made mistakes, and we have some experience.

Using industry standards is the best starting point, not necessarily the final answer. Every project has special characteristics. You may need to subdivide certain divisions to reflect the realities of the project. If your contract requires statutory holdbacks or negotiated retainage, then your reporting needs to distinguish between earned cost and cash disbursed.

If you have bonded off-site improvements, they may need to live in a separate section of the budget from onsite civil work because it behaves differently from both a lender and a risk management standpoint. Same is true for change orders. Sometimes change orders get billed separately, but then they need to be broken down into the actual categories for reconciling. The change orders with the categories becomes extremely important.

What you’re trying to avoid is the system where one line item in the budget has to serve too many masters at once. If one line item has to reconcile subcontractor invoices, tax rebates, lender draws, holdbacks, revised forecast changes, then that line item is too broad. It’s no longer a category; it becomes a big shoebox full of receipts.

The other mistake that people make is they assume the budget is only for cost tracking. It’s not. It’s for communication. It tells your lender what happened. It tells your investors where the money went. And most importantly, if the project is over budget, it’s going to be used for calculating and disbursing contingency funds that are available as part of the project budget. If that isn’t accurate, it’s going to be very difficult to gain access to the contingency funds that are part of the budget.

So my advice is simply: start with industry standard divisions. Build the budget to match how the project is going to be purchased, built, reimbursed, and financed, and add categories only where special programs and contractual realities require more visibility. Don’t oversimplify it for the sake of appearance, but don’t make it overly complex either. A construction budget is hard enough. Your budget should help you manage complexity, not add to it.

As you think about that, have an awesome rest of your day. Go make some great things happen. We’ll talk again tomorrow.

Stay connected and discover more about my work in real estate and by visiting and following me on various platforms: